Input Info avqsv video: H.264/AVC, 1920x1080, 50/1 fpsĮncoded 2500 frames, 54.79 fps, 4983.10 kbps, 29.70 MBįrame type B 1870, total size 6.31 MB x264 medium 15fps:Ĭode: ffmpeg -i 1.mkv -c:v libx264 -preset medium -b:v 5000k 1x264.mkvįfmpeg version N-83195-ge371f03 Copyright (c) 2000-2017 the FFmpeg developersĬonfiguration: -enable-gpl -enable-version3 -enable-cuda -enable-cuvid -enable-d3d11va -enable-dxva2 -enable-libmfx -enable-nvenc -enable-avisynth -enable-bzlib -enable-fontconfig -enable-frei0r -enable-gnutls -enable-iconv -enable-libass -enable-libbluray -enable-libbs2b -enable-libcaca -enable-libfreetype -enable-libgme -enable-libgsm -enable-libilbc -enable-libmodplug -enable-libmp3lame -enable-libopencore-amrnb -enable-libopencore-amrwb -enable-libopenh264 -enable-libopenjpeg -enable-libopus -enable-librtmp -enable-libsnappy -enable-libsoxr -enable-libspeex -enable-libtheora -enable-libtwolame -enable-libvidstab -enable-libvo-amrwbenc -enable-libvorbis -enable-libvpx -enable-libwavpack -enable-libwebp -enable-libx264 -enable-libx265 -enable-libxavs -enable-libxvid -enable-libzimg -enable-lzma -enable-decklink -enable-zlibĮncoder : libebml v1.2.2 + libmatroska v1.3.0ĭuration: 00:00:50.00, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 29006 kb/s Media SDK QuickSyncVideo (hardware encoder) PG, 1st GPU, API v1.19īuffer Memory d3d9, 1 input buffer, 21 work buffer
Amd 8150 quicksync driver#
X265 is very computationally intensive, I think you're expecting way too much out of that class of cpu's.Ĭode: QSVEncC64.exe -i 1.mkv -c hevc -vbr 5000 -o 1hevc.mkvī pyramid is not supported on current platform, disabled.Ĭop.PicTimingSEI value changed off -> auto by driverĬop3.DirectBiasAdjustment value changed off -> auto by driverĬop3.GlobalMotionBiasAdjustment value changed off -> auto by driver
Amd 8150 quicksync 1080p#
Having said that, IF you were talking 1080p content I would be very surprised if a Phenom II 555 was able to get 7 fps with x265 and I would be surprised if the Zambezi saw 10 fps for 1080p content.
Amd 8150 quicksync software#
What do I need for software and the settings for it to get it to work faster? I can guarantee that your comparison is flawed in one or more ways, such as using different sources to test encode speed, different resolution, different settings for the encoder etc. How does such a large increase in processing power get such a piddly little increase in conversion speed? Four more cores, 3.3Ghz vs 3.2 plus at least 2 years newer core design and all it can manage is a 2~3 FPS increase? How well does it do on HEVC conversion? Not quite TEN frames per second, with all cores selected in MediaCoder. That one was able to do at best 7 frames per second.Ĭurrent system is a 3.3Ghz 6 core FX Zambezi, 95W TDP from South Korea (could only find 125W versions in the US) with 8 gig DDR3. I was running a system with a dual core Phenom II 555 with 6 gig DDR2.
Attempting to do some HEVC conversion to shrink the file size of videos.
0 kommentar(er)
